New To Grant Management? Check Out These Websites and You Won’t Be!

Posted on Wed 8 July 2015
Written by Flexi-Grant

Written by Claire, Marketing Executive at Fluent Technology, research nerd, travel fanatic & coffee-based life form. 

Many of our clients are grant experts.  They’ve been managing and distributing grants for a number of years, in many different capacities.  They know where to go to get advice, they know how to create meaningful data from applications and they follow best practice like it’s going out of fashion.

BUT there are those of us out there that are beginners, (like myself two years ago).  They enter the market knowing nothing and needing to know EVERYTHING.

So where do you start?

It’s simple…work backwards.  Figure out WHAT your organisation wants to achieve then research best practice to find other charities and grant giving organisations that are perfecting it like it’s an art.

In the words of the website that I’m about to rave about; “borrowing is the new innovation” (Source: GrantCraft, ‘Borrowing is the New Innovation’, May 2015).


(The brain child of the Foundation Centre)

With a slick new website (just recently launched), GrantCraft is the place to be if you want to find out more on best practice, user experience reviews, collaboration techniques and ESPECIALLY, real life cases of organisations that successfully manage their grants in a way that achieves maximum impact to the communities and projects they fund.

Publications I’d recommend:

  • Communication That Counts: Lessons From South African Social Investors –
  • Borrowing Is The New Innovation –
  • Supporting Grantee Capacity: Strengthening Effectiveness Together
  • –

Grants Managers Network (GMN)

Although it’s a US based organisation with US based recommendations the GMN website is a fantastic hub for everything grant management related  no matter where you’re based.  They provide non-biased information on grant management that helps thousands of grant giving organisations around the world every day.  With their endless supply of resources on topics like reviewer approvals, board meetings, grantee perspectives etc., as well as several surveys which they carry out on a regular basis, this is a great place to get a grasp on everything about grant management.  They’re also very approachable if you have any questions and you’re confused about anything (and eager to help!)

TIP: Check out ‘Project Streamline’

Publications I’d recommend:

Recommended Posts.

I Hate Flying.

Written by Keith.

I hate flying. While I don’t like heights it’s nothing to do with that.  What gets to me is the chaos that invariably ensues during boarding.  I can hear you sighing and saying “Is that it?”. Ok, I admit it, I am a process nerd.  I like things orderly and running smoothly, that’s when I’m at my happiest.  Try boarding a plane and watching what happens.  Try sitting on a plane that’s full and listening to the Flight Attendants’ continual announcements that passengers should stow small baggage at their feet as the overhead bins are too full.  A good test of their patience (passed with flying, excuse the pun, colours), not so good if you are listening and wondering why everyone didn’t understand it the first 3 times…

Reports. What Reports?

Written by Keith.

While giving a product demonstration last week I was inevitably asked “What reports do you have?”.  I hate that question!  Why?  Because I know as soon as I start to show any standard reports that we have in Flexi-Grant I will invariably hear: “That’s great but what I really need is…”.    As a result I try to avoid showing reports as an immediate response to that question!

Reports, what Reports?

Standardise or not to Standardise.

Written by Keith.

I have been fortunate to sit in on a number of review panels over the years and have observed many different ways in which review panels and committees reach their decisions.   What I find most interesting is how different individuals approach the job of scoring applications.  Even though there can be guidelines and a common scoring framework some reviewers like to be generous with their scores and take off points if they feel applications are missing essential details.  Others reviewers are “less generous” with their scores (I was tempted to say meaner but that would be cruel!) and only award points when they feel an application merits it…